Act Now
 
	Empower U: Learn to Access Your Disability Rights Training on Canadian Human Rights, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and its Optional Protocol (OP) training aims to increase awareness of how to address discrimination using more familiar Canadian human rights laws such as Human Rights Codes and the newer international Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). This is training for persons with disabilities by persons with disabilities. The training is part of a project funded by Employment and Social Development Canada and implemented by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) in collaboration with Canadian Multicultural Disability Centre Inc. (CMDCI), Citizens With Disabilities – Ontario (CWDO), Manitoba League of Persons with Disabilities (MLPD) and National Educational Association of Disabled Students (NEADS). Read more.
Sign Up for our monthly digest
A monthly newsletter from CCD about what is happening in the community
Disability-Rights Organizations' Public Statement on the Urgent Need to Rethink Bill C-7, The Proposed Amendment to Canada's Medical Aid in Dying Legislation
Related Documents
February 26, 2024
C-62: CCD, ARCH, Inclusion Canada, DAWN Canada Urged Changes to MAiD Bill - February 23, 2024
November 25, 2021
An Open Letter from the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) Concerning the Canadian Psychiatric Association Position Statement on Medical Aid in Dying (MAiD)
March 15, 2021
CCD Disappointed by House of Commons Yes Vote on Bill C-7 (Medical Aid in Dying)
COVID-19 Crisis has Exposed Systemic Ableism in Healthcare
	
	COVID-19 has clearly revealed the ableism that is rampant in Canada’s healthcare system. Over the past five months, we’ve seen not only the introduction of critical care triage protocols which identify the preexistence of a disability as an exclusion criterion for critical care, in the event that rationing of resources, such as ventilators, becomes necessary due to overwhelming demand; we’ve  also seen elderly and disabled people who fall ill being left to die in nursing homes and never sent for medical care in hospitals. We are promised better facilities for warehousing elderly and disabled people, rather than in-home supports where the risk of contagion is lower. Provinces raise pay rates for personal support workers in nursing homes, luring away those who provided home care and stranding disabled and elderly people without community supports.  In short, the policy failures that cause people to ask for assisted suicide and euthanasia have been laid bare and amplified, yet nothing is being done to change those policies.  And the elective procedure that is MAiD continues apace, even as cancer and corrective procedures are postponed.
	
	An Urgent Call to Re-Think Bill C-7
	
	The Canadian disability-rights community remains united in denouncing Bill C-7 as an assault on the Equality Rights of people with disabilities. The flaws—and, indeed, the overt pro-MAID bias— which characterized the “consultation” process leading up to the tabling of Bill C-7 are well documented. In short, everything from the online questionnaire to the in-person consultations were geared toward a pre-determined outcome, namely, the expansion of Medical Assistance in Dying as a legally- and socially-sanctioned substitute for assistance in living that we see in Bill C-7.
	
	Many social commentators have contended that the COVID-19 crisis is instigating a sober re-thinking of our values and priorities as a society, and  speculate that our “new normal” will include a new appreciation of both the value and the fragility of human life, and a consequent new commitment to protecting and supporting the lives of everyone, including those who require assistance with personal care. Disability-rights advocates are calling for a parallel sober re-think of the ways in which the lives of Canadians with disabilities can be both protected and supported, while maintaining a careful balance of equality rights and autonomy rights. This re-think needs to begin with the substantive revision of Bill C-7 before it is reintroduced.
1. Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD)
	2. Inclusion Canada (formerly Canadian Association for Community Living)
	3. Val Surbey, Winnipeg, Manitoba - “as an individual who has Substitute Decision Making Status for two of my sons”
	4. Nancy E Hansen, PhD, Winnipeg, Manitoba
	5. Audrey D. Cole O.Ont.
	6. Shabbir M.H. Alibhai, MD, MSc, FRCPC
	7. Prof. Tanya Titchkosky, Disability Studies, University of Toronto.
	8. Denise Walker, Smiths Falls, Ontario
	9. Planned Lifetime Advocacy Network
	10.  Sally A. Kimpson, RN, PhD
	Critical Disability Studies Scholar & Activist
	11. Mary Kate Gazendam, MD, CCFP, FCFP
	12. Nancy Craig , family doctor, Edmonton AB, and parent of an adult with disabilities
	13. Eliza Garrett
	14. Linda Sepp
	Nepean, Ontario
	15. Ann F. Garrett, Bright's Grove, Ontario
	16. Sophia Ho, Aurora, Ontario
	17. Community Living Ontario
	18. Lisa Bendall, Toronto Ontario
	19. Richard Wynia, Beamsville, ON
	20. The Association for Reformed Political Action (ARPA)
	21. Jeff Preston, PhD
	22. Susan Mahipaul, PhD, OT Reg. (Ont.)
	Critical Disability Scholar & Advocate
	23. Rose Galbraith
	24. Catherine Frazee, Professor emerita, Ryerson University School of Disability Studies.
	25. Inclusion Saskatchewan
	26. Robert M. Randoy
	27. Beverly A. Randoy
	28. Alexandre Savoie-Perron
	29. Evangelical Fellowship of Canada
	30. Lorraine Silliphant
	31.     Rabbi David Seed, president of the Toronto Board of Rabbis
	32. L’Arche Canada
	33. Karen Mason, Retired family physician
	34. Mary OConnor MD, Ottawa, Ontario
	35. Maria Wolfs, MD MHSc FRCPC
	    Staff endocrinologist St. Michael's Hospital, assistant professor University of Toronto
	36. Dr. Teresa McKenna
	37. Alex Schadenberg, Executive Director – Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
38. Karol Boschung, B.A.(Hons)
	Medical Student, University of British Columbia
	39. Sheila Rutledge Harding, MD, MA, FRCPC
	40. Wlodzimierz (Vladimir) Sokolowski MD
	41. Theresa Winchester
	42. Michael Bayer, MD
	43. Cynthia L Haig MD
	44. Dennis Bowie, MD, FRCP(Respirology)
	45. Robert J W Blanchard Md, BSc(Med), MS (Surg), FRCS, FACS. Professor Emeritus, Surgery
	46. Thomas L. Cavanagh, Lloydminster, Alberta
	47. Ivan R. Unger  MD retired
	48. Suzanne Parenteau
	49. Judy Sloan
	50. Teresa Ostapowicz, family physician
	51. Jesse Fontaine
	52. Colleen Shantz, Calgary, Alberta
	53. Paul-Émile Trudeau
	54. Hélène Lapointe, Montréal
	55. Gordon Duncan
	56. Lois Duncan
	57. Margaret M Cottle, MD, CCFP(PC)
	58. Rene Leiva, MD Ottawa
	59. Dr. Sherry Chan, MD, CCFP
	60. Andrea Milne-Epp, Edmonton, Alberta
	61. Gordon Friesen, Montreal
	62. Marie-Charlotte Koenig, MD, CCMF
	63. Dr. Barbara Powell MD, CCFP, FCFP
	64. Dr Eileen Cochien
	65. Catherine Ferrier MD
	66. Dr Pierrette Girard
	67. Roman Zyla, MD
	68. Alexandra Zyla, MD
	69. Anthony Kerigan, Palliative Physician, Hamilton ON
	70. André Rochon, médecin omnipraticien, Montréal
	71. Paul Yong, MD, PhD, FRCSC
	72. Jean-Bernard Girodias, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC
	73. Cameron W. Pierce (MD/FRCPC General Internal Medicine, Respirology), Vancouver, BC, Canada
	74. Michael Hale, President, Alliance for Life Ontario
	75. Mrs Jakki Jeffs, President Catholic Women’s League, Basilica of Our Lady Immaculate
	76. Canadian Angelman Syndrome Society
	77. Dr Amy Megyesi, Full service family medicine, Salmon Arm, BC
	78. Natalia Novosedlik, CCFP(PC)
	79. Catherine L McCallum
	80. Donald JB McCallum
	81. Dre Geneviève Falardeau
	82. Canadian Physicians for Life
	83. Olga Riedemann
 
	Tracy Latimer
The Latimer Case
The Latimer case directly concerned the rights of persons with disabilities. Mr. Latimer's view was that a parent has the right to kill a child with a disability if that parent decides the child's quality of life no longer warrants its continuation. CCD explained to the court and to the public how that view threatens the lives of people with disabilities and is deeply offensive to fundamental constitutional values. Learn more.
